Science vs Non-Science
Which seems more logical to you?
Search This Blog
MEN: Think of your current sexual partner. How much difference exists between their weight and the weight of your ideal partner?
WOMEN: Think of your current sexual partner. How much difference exists between their weight and the weight of your ideal partner?
Do mice have STD"s?
Important Links
Me...
- Matt
- I study the evolution of mating systems in mammals, specifically Peromyscus. Along those lines, I woks with MHC genes and sexually transmitted diseases to better understand how all 3 factors are related to reproductive success, and mate choice.
2 comments:
I have to say I strongly disagre. Religionds do evelove and branch, not just end. What if you meet an
eathist person who dosent belive in science? Where is there chart?
In this figure science seems more logical. But as you know, it is a deliberate "misunderstanding" of what faith, and theology is about.
As someone who has never been to the US, I get astonished over and over again, by the mutual arrogance and disrespect that theists and naturalists have for each other in America. No wonder why religious folks are sceptical towards science, and why materialists are sceptical towards religious faith.
What if theists and naturalists would take each other a bit more seriously? I think there's a good chance that the so called "stupid creationists" would become more interested in natural science, and that "cold-harted materialists" would become more interested in whats holy, if both sides lay their policy of confrontation aside.
Post a Comment